Trump's False Statements in News Conference Analyzed

According to a new analysis of a 64-minute news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate by the National Public Radio, a team that occupied the office states that, Trump made 162.5 inaccurate statements, exaggerations, and falsehoods. This represent that he made more than two misstatements a minute, which should be something worth worrying whether the former President of the United States should be presumed to tell the truth. The occurrence indicates that the rallies will start again, and the competition for the Republican nomination next year has begun. From the conference, most of the statements that Trump made did not correlate with the real thing. For example, he said that their national security is of concern, and the economic condition to the economy is worse than anticipated, shows that Trump has pertinent evidence that might lead the state to be war before the end of the year but anyone following the geopolitical analysis and economic data should be worried since those allegations are not true.

The issue should be stipulated, whether the leaders should tell the truth or not, discuss the importance of being honest when campaigning for elective posts or when leading this nation. In this case, therefore, as the August eight general election approaches, do you agree that leaders must be asked to stick to the truth when they address a charged hall? Considering that the initial public analysis shows that the statements that the leaders make must be subject to social media scrutiny. It might be ethical for the audience not to buy their argument.